What is Relevance?
A few days ago, Scott McClellan threw out a question on the Collide Magazine blog that is worth thinking about. He asked, “What does relevance mean to you?” And, “What doesn’t relevance mean to you?” He’s working on an article for an upcoming issue.
Here are some thoughts I sent to Scott:
- Relevance doesn’t necessarily mean cool or flashy or trendy.
- Relevance doesn’t mean it’s never been done before.
- Relevance isn’t defined by doing something so crazy that you get the attention of church leaders from around the country.
- Relevance is all about being missional. You are studying the culture and figuring out what works. The goal is to communicate. So you figure out what it takes to communicate (either one-on-one or in a group setting) to the people in front of you.
- You can’t use blanket statements in regards to relevance. You can’t say, “Your church has a choir so it must be irrelevant” or “Your pastor preaches in faded jeans and a shirt from The Buckle so he must be relevant.” Relevance is contextual—and every context is different.
- Relevance must be constantly evaluated. What was relevant last year may be irrelevant this year.
- Relevance is best determined by a team. What seems incredibly relevant to one person may be deemed irrelevant by a crowd of people. We tend to think smarter about these things when we have a diverse team helping us out.
- Relevance is hard work. At Granger, it is a very high value. In fact, cultural relevance is one of our core values. However, I bet we miss the mark on this three or four times each year. We go into a series totally convinced that it will be a home run—and at times we have found out that it had very little relevance to our crowd. We don’t let this discourage us, though. We just keep trying to be better at knowing our culture.
- Relevance doesn’t necessarily equal “felt need sermon series.” Sometimes it will—like when you deliver a parenting or marriage series because you believe that is the most relevant topic you can offer to connect people to Jesus. At other times, the most relevant thing you can do is offer some theological grounding or invite people to prayer and worship.
That’s what I think. What would you add or subtract from this list?
Posted by Tim Stevens | 10 comments










Tom Becker
I would add that there is nothing new under the sun.
Chris Miller
What made Jesus relevant?
Humility
He treated everyone with respect and wanted to know and learn about people of all kinds.
He didn't simply have the same interests as someone else; He was always interested in them.
He spent time with people.
He believed that they were valuable and important.
He served.
He asked questions and listened, and because of this way about him, he understood people, why they hurt, their desires, interests, and what they really needed.
As Christians, we seem to be so obsessed with the idea of relevance.
WE'VE GOT TO BE RELEVANT. WE'VE GOT TO BE RELEVANT….but maybe we don't need to be.
Maybe we don't need to talk about, focus on, or become more relevant.
Maybe we need to talk about, focus on, and become more humble and maybe if we did, relevance would take care of itself.
Jesus WAS relevant.
He served. He listened. He gave. He was interested.
He treated people as if the were more important than him, more valuable than him.
Perhaps the most relevant thing we can ever do for someone is to serve them.
Todd Hiltibran
I hear what you're saying, but there is still the question of how you serve. When I moved to Poland I would try to start up conversations with people. First, I had to learn the language. Second, I had to learn where it was 'okay' to have random conversations. Third, I had to learn what questions it was acceptable to ask them. It's not okay to start a conversation with someone at a bus stop. It's not a good idea to ask someone, 'What do you do for a living?' It is perfectly acceptable for them to ask you how much you paid for something.
I see relevance as an act of understanding the culture. The church (in most countries) has lost contact with the predominant culture, so our serving might be awkward or not be appreciated as service. So I'm not promoting relevance as an end in itself, but as a means of focusing the message of the Bible to address culture, thus serving them well in a way they appreciate.
dannyjbixby
Good list. Some additions:
Relevance is necessary in every context, but will look slightly different in every context as well.
Relevance isn't about embracing cultural ideals. It's not about conforming to culture.
Relevance for the sake of relevance isn't relevant.
Ricky
I agree. What's rural for us in rural North Georgia probably seems ancient to someone in another locale. This is why it's dangerous to try to just take someone else's formula and expect it to work the same in a different location. The message is the same, at it's heart, but the method is constantly changing. Great list, Thanks!
Dan
I agree with Danny. We need to courage to say relevance is conforming to culture. In my background thats sinful. But I think God adapting to us means we should adapt to them.
I wrote a blog – http://gracefreakdan.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/god…
I think it justifies a theological foundation for cultural relevance.
Thanks
Grace Freak
Dan Rockwell
Ricky
My mistake, I meant "what is RELEVANT in Rural North Georgia…"
Gary Yonek
I think that being culturally relevant is about using the tools and language that God's given us TODAY to continuously translate and effectively engage people in the truth of scripture. Culture doesn't dictate the truth of Christ's Gospel, however if it is unrecognizable and unapproachable to a people group, then it becomes not only irrelevant, but meaningless. In my mind taking something as eternally transforming as the grace, love and forgiveness of Jesus, and relegating it to a language or form that is uncomprehesible or unobtainable, is a sin as well. My understanding is that the re-printed bible came into existence less than 500 years ago. The increase in a literate culture since, and the technology of the day was used to effectively teach and still is. I think that the reason cultural relevance can appear to be "embracing" culture is that it well… probably does to some degree. http://garyyonek.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/relevan…
cindy
i cannot understant if what meaning of relevant
cindy
no